Presented
at the Saudi Health 2014 Conference held in Riyadh May 20-21, 2014 under the
theme 'Patient First: Bridging the
Gap from Rhetoric to Reality’ by Professor Omar Hasan Kasule Sr MB ChB(MUK),
MPH (Harvard), DrPH (Harvard) Faculty of Medicine and Chair of the Ethics and
IRB committees at King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh.
INTRODUCTION
·
The paper
argues for a new paradigm that requires hospitals to treat family members as
honored guests who are an indispensable component of the psycho-social-physical
modalities of the therapeutic process.
· Families
played this role in the pre-hospital home-centered care but lost it when care
shifted to high-technology hospitals based on the biomedical and not the
holistic model.
· The paradigm
of holistic care requires that this role be reactivated and be recognized in
modern hospitals.
FAMILY ROLES
· Family presence
(FP)
·
-Family support
(FS)
·
-Family-centered
care (FCC)
·
-Fulfilment of
the obligatory social duties of visiting the patient (‘iyadat al mariidh)
·
-Joining kindred
relations (silat al rahim).
FAMILY ROLES
·
-FP during various
hospital activities has benefits and no adverse impact on care-
·
-FS for the
patient is associated with better compliance and better outcomes
·
-FCC is
associated with high satisfaction, and is a form of health education.
CHANGE OF PARADIGM
·
-The paper
calls for a change of policies, procedures, and attitudes to enable the family
play its role as welcome guests of the hospitals and not just be tolerated
intruders.
·
-The families
are guests of the hospital and not of the patient; the hospital should honor
them as guests (ikram al dhaif) with
all the related legal rights.
·
-The family
welcome should not exceed limits and affect adversely the hospital routines or
disturb other patients and their families whose right of neighborhood (haqq al jaar) should be respected.
FAMILY PRESENCE (FP)- ATTITUDES OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS
·
-Research has
shown that some healthcare professionals (HCPs) have negative attitudes to family
presence during resuscitation (FPDR) while others have negative ones[1],[2].
·
-Negative
attitudes may be due to Health Care Professionals’ (HCP) concern that family
members may see resuscitation as chaotic and may sue[3] or that FP may lead to
shorter visits and less patient centered communication by HCPs[4].
FAMILY PRESENCE (FP)- ATTITUDES OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS
·
-Negative HCP
attitudes are behind the failure to implement recommended FP protocols that are
recommended at many hospitals[5].
·
-Policy
changes, education, training have been shown to change negative attitudes to,
perceptions of, and acceptance of FPDR[6].
FAMILY PRESENCE (FP)- RISKS AND BENEFITS
·
-FPDR has
benefits and risks[7]
but the benefits outweigh the risks.
·
-FP during
dressings in a burn unit had educational benefits[10]
·
-FP was found beneficial
to child, family and healthcare workers[11] in invasive procedures.
·
-FP had no
adverse effects on pediatric trauma resuscitation[12]
·
-FP has been
described in resuscitation in the OR[13], brain death testing[14], cutting off of life
support[15], bedside teaching during
ward rounds[16].
FAMILY SUPPORT (FS)
·
-A paradigm
shift is needed in the concept of family support (FS) from giving support to
the family of the patient to[17],[18],[19] to empowering the
family to support the patient.
·
-Family
caregivers suffer psychological and spiritual distress[20] and may need use of
mental health services[21] and other forms of social
support[22], programs[23], and interventions[24].
·
-Despite their
stress, family members are able to give support to the patients with beneficial
results for cancer patients[25].
FAMILY SUPPORT (FS)
·
-FS for pregnant
women with pre-existing diabetes helped in the management of the pregnancy[26].
·
-FS helped in weight
loss for the obese[27].
·
-FS for general
nutritional support for diabetics whether general[28] or diet-specific[29] improved metabolic
outcomes.
·
-FS improved physical
activity[30], led to higher adherence
to treatment regimens[31], and access to digital
health information[32].
FAMILY CENTERED CARE (FCC)
·
-The doctrine
of family centered care (FCC) under which the family can be involved in the
therapeutic process finds more acceptance in home care than in hospital care.
·
-FCC leads to
accommodating values and priorities of families in therapeutic decisions[33] such as professionals
respect family expertise in care for children with special needs[34].
·
-Family members
can be involved in ICU decision making[35], advance planning for
adolescents with cancer[36], pediatric ICU palliative care[37], and family-centered ward
rounds[38].
FAMILY CENTERED CARE (FCC)
·
-The benefits
of FCC are not confined to the hospital, family members can learn health
lessons such as education on infectious diseases[39].
·
-FCC is
considered so important by some hospitals that patient and family advisors are
involved in its execution[40].
TOWARDS A NEW PARADIGM
·
-A holistic
approach motivates inclusion of the family in the hospital’s therapeutic team.
The family are honored as guests of the hospital according to the rules and
etiquette of honoring guests, ikram al
dhaif[43].
·
-The family
should not abuse the hospitality by interrupting unnecessarily the operations
of the hospital just as a house guest should not overstay beyond the customary
three days[44]
·
-The family
should not violate the welfare and rights of other patients and families and
should treat them well, ihsan ila al jaar[45].
TOWARDS A NEW PARADIGM
·
-Presence of
the family in the hospital has religious and social consequences: joining
kindred relations, silat al rahm[46]
·
-Fulfilling the
duty of visiting the sick enjoined by the prophet[47] [48] as having a lot of merit[49],and considered one of the
5 duties of brotherhood[50]
TOWARDS A NEW PARADIGM
·
-The family can
make dua for the patient[51]
·
-The family encourages
the patient to take medication except if considered futile[52]
·
-The family encourages
the patient to eat pleasure-causing food[53]
·
-The family
helps by saying good things, kalimat
taibat, when visiting the patient[54]
NOTES
[7] Kramer DB et al. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14; 368(11):1058-9.
[8] Clark AP et al. Evid Based Ment Health. 2013 Aug; 16(3)
[46] Sahih Bukhari No 6138
[48] Sahih Bukhari No 5650
[49] Sahih Muslim No 2568
[50] Sahih Bukhari No 1240
[51] Sahih Muslim No 2191
[52] Sahih Bukhari
No 6897
[53] Sahih Bukhari
No 5689