search this site.

140519L - PREPARING PATIENTS FOR INVASIVE PROCEDURES-WORD SLIDES

Print Friendly and PDFPrint Friendly

Lecture for medical students at the Faculty of Medicine King Fahad Medical City on 19th May 2014 by Professor Omar Hasan Kasule Sr.


·         Impact of anxiety: the length and difficulty of the procedure may be increased, inaccurate data may be obtained from the procedure, and physical harm may occur as a result.
·         Psychological preparation for invasive procedures prevents anxiety

·         Intrusive healthcare experiences can have a profound negative impact on a child's psychological well-being for months to years after the experience.
·         We need techniques and strategies to enable the child cope
·         Techniques for preparation
·         Techniques for procedural support
·         Techniques for follow-up,

PSYCHOLOGICAL PREPARATION OF CHILDREN FOR SURGERY[3]
·         Puppet play
·         Mother counseling

·         Preoperative anxiety is associated with a number of poor postoperative outcomes and with significant parental and child distress before surgery.
·         Preparing children for surgery can prevent many behavioral and physiologic manifestations of anxiety.
·         Psychologic and behavioral interventions and pharmacologic interventions are available to treat preoperative anxiety in children.
·         This article discusses the psychologic preparation of children for surgery.

·         The cost of a preparation program is relatively low, but its value for the subject undergoing treatment is very high.
·         Feelings of satisfaction and contentment usually accompany the preparation process, and are mutual.
·         Preparation programs must be implemented regularly and systematically.
·         The preparation program must allow for the special characteristics of each child and family
·         Demonstration aids are used to stresses love for children
·         Counseling
·         Cooperation between all the agents involved

·         Research in this area there are methodological weaknesses in previous research, and make suggestions for improving future research.
·         In general, preparation interventions have been shown to be effective across a range of health outcomes. However, the relative efficacy of different strategies has been difficult to assess, as has the contribution of several patient variables to outcome.
·         Considering interventions used prior to surgery, there is not a clear demonstration of effectiveness, in part because large numbers of outcome variables have been used.
·         In contrast, the preparation intervention literature using adult patients facing invasive medical procedures has shown the relative superiority of modeling procedures and coping strategies.

·         Psychological preparation for invasive medical and dental procedures has been based on the rationale that high levels of pre-procedural fear are detrimental to patients' subsequent adaptation.
·         Outcome studies that have employed informative, psychotherapeutic, modeling, behavioral, cognitive-behavioral, and/or hypnotic techniques are summarized and evaluated.
·         Although the research suggests that each of these approaches can be effective, such serious methodological problems as heterogeneity of sample characteristics, limited range of outcome measures, and lack of manipulation checks prevent definitive conclusions.
·         Legal-ethical concerns and the issue of cost effectiveness are also considered. Suggestions are made for future research and theory development.

·         Previous studies offer contradictory evidence regarding the effects of cortisol changes on health outcomes for surgical heart patients. Increased cortisol and inflammation have been related to psychological stress while separate studies have found an inverse relation between cortisol and inflammation.
·         Psychological preparations for surgery can reduce stress and improve outcomes and may interact with cortisol changes. Following from these relationships, we hypothesised that a preparation for surgery will interact with changes in cortisol to affect outcomes.
·         Measures were the SF 36 General Health and Activities, medical visits and satisfaction.

CORTISOL CHANGES INTERACT WITH THE EFFECTS OF A COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL PSYCHOLOGICAL PREPARATION FOR SURGERY ON 12-MONTH OUTCOMES FOR SURGICAL HEART PATIENTS…2
·         Eighty-five patients were randomly assigned to standard care plus a psychological preparation or standard care alone using a single-blind methodology.
·         Data on psychological and biological functioning were collected at admission, 1 day prior and 5 days post-surgery, and 12-months after hospital discharge.
·         General health and activities, and medical visits were related to the interaction of cortisol change and psychological preparation in support of the hypothesis.
·         Patients were more satisfied in the preparation group than controls.
·         Based on these findings, some outcomes from psychological preparations may be affected by changes in levels of cortisol. These results caution against a one-size-fits-all approach to psychological preparations.

·         OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of extensive psychic preparation for cardiac surgery and to see whether personality characteristics modify these effects.
·         DESIGN: Randomized. SETTING: St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein and the center of the Dutch Heart Foundation for patient projects 'Hartenark', Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
·         METHOD: Patients waiting for cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to a preparatory programme: a 2-hour information programme in the hospital or a 2-day programme in the Hartenark, comprising medical information, relaxation exercises and group discussions. Psychological assessments were made by questionnaires preoperatively and at 4-month follow-up.

[MORE PSYCHOLOGICAL PREPARATION IN HEART SURGERY FOR CERTAIN PATIENTS IS BENEFICIAL]…RESULTS
·         Of 223 patients, II were lost, 94 joined the informative programme and II8 the more extensive preparation. There were 174 men and 38 women, whose average ages were 58.6 and 60.3 years, respectively.
·         The scores in the preoperative preparatory programmes were the same.
·         After-surgery scores on 'subjective invalidity' and 'vital exhaustion' were improved, while those on 'somatic neurosis' and especially 'anxiety' were deteriorated, in both programmes.
·         When taking in account the preoperative psychic condition, it was shown that the more extensive programme benefited patients who preoperatively had relatively few psychosomatic complaints or relatively strong anxiety.

[MORE PSYCHOLOGICAL PREPARATION IN HEART SURGERY FOR CERTAIN PATIENTS IS BENEFICIAL]…CONCLUSION:
·         Extensive preparation for cardiac surgery had a positive effect on physical wellbeing and anxiety in patients who before the operation had relatively few complaints or indicated that they were anxious.
·         Patients who reported less anxiety and patients who felt less well physically before the operation benefited more from a information programme.

·         The effects of pre-surgery intervention messages on postsurgical pain and recovery in 42 female patients were compared.
·         Each participant was scheduled for at least two periodontal surgeries and exposed to one of four messages before each surgery.
·         Auditory and visual messages classified as "control enhancement" were associated with reduction of pain after the second surgery with no effect after the first surgery.

·         Hospitalization and surgery are generally accepted as stressful situations for children.
·         A review of the literature indicates therapeutic play is effective in helping children cope with stressful situations.
·         This article further illustrates the benefits of using therapeutic play in the psychological preparation of preschool children undergoing cardiac surgery.
·         Play as a useful assessment and intervention tool for the nurse is examined.




[1] Moline LR. J Vasc Nurs. 2000 Dec;18(4):117-22
[2] Breiner SM. J Infus Nurs. 2009 Sep-Oct;32(5):252-6.
[5] Bar-Mor G. J Pediatr Nurs. 1997 Aug;12(4):252-5
[8] Shelley M1, Pakenham KI, Frazer I. Psychol Health. 2009 Dec;24(10):1139-52.
[10] Croog SH1, Baume RM, Nalbandian J. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994 Oct;125(10):1353-60.
[11] Abbott KIssues Compr Pediatr Nurs.1990 Oct-Dec;13(4):265-77.