search this site.

210627P - CLASSIFICATION OF CLINICAL TRIALS

Print Friendly and PDFPrint Friendly

Presentation at a workshop on Clinical Trials – Clinical Research Program held at the King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh on 27 June 2021 at 11.00 am. By: Professor Omar Hasan Kasule MB ChB (MUK), MPH (Harvard), DrPH (Harvard) Professor of Epidemiology and Bioethics, King Fahad Medical City

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY GRAND OBJECTIVES (Primary & Secondary)

Therapeutic clinical trials are controlled experiments to compare the effectiveness of different treatments by random allocation of study participants to treatment and control groups, observing the outcome of interest (death, cure, tumor size), adverse events, quality of life, etc.

 Preventive trials are controlled experiments to study the effect of an intervention on preventing the outcome of interest.


CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY GEOGRAPHY

 Single center

Multi-center national

 Multicenter International


CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY RANDOMIZATION

 Random allocation vs non-random allocation.

Simple randomization vs blocked/stratified/cluster randomization. Simple randomization requires a large sample size. Stratified randomization balances are confounding and prognostic factors.

 In cluster randomization = it is the whole group such as a hospital that is allocated.

 Fixed probability random allocation vs variable probability allocation (adaptive).

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY TREATMENT OBJECTIVE

Comparative effectiveness research. = compare two treatments both considered standards of care. This study is 2 sided.

 Superiority vs noninferiority trials = see if a new treatment is equal to or not worse than the approved treatment. This study is one-sided.

 Equivalence trial.


CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY TYPE OF CONTROL (We learn by comparing)

 Parallel study = We follow simultaneously the cases and controls from time zero.

 Cross over a patient serves as his own control with a washout period between the two interventions. Because of the pairing, we use a smaller sample size.

 Withdrawal you start all on the intervention and after a time withdraw some.

 Before and after/pre-post.

 Factorial tests 2 interventions in the same study.

 Uncontrolled/quasi-experimental.

 Pragmatic trials follow usual practice and are more generalizable.


CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY SIZE

 Large multi-center trials with extensive.

 Simple small trials (can be combined by meta-analysis).


CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY BLINDING

Non-blinded.

 Single blinding: participant does not know.

 Double blinding: participant and investigator do not know. Blind can be broken if the drug and placebo look different?

 Triple blinding: participant, investigator, and data monitoring committee/statistician do not know.


CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY TYPE OF COMPARISON / CONTROL GROUP

 Historical,

 Concurrent,

 Self,

 Untreated,

 Placebo,

 Negative,

 Positive controls.


CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY PHASE

 Clinical trials are preceded by screening in vivo in animals and in vitro in human tissues.

Phase 1 trials study maximum tolerated doses, drug administration schedules, drug toxicity, and evidence of anti-tumor activity.

 Phase 2 studies assess the therapeutic activity of a drug in advanced disease on a small number of patients.


CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY PHASE con’t.

 Phase 3 trials are used to compare a drug to a placebo or a new drug to an existing drug. Comparability is assured by randomization and equal handling of the 2 groups. The sample size is larger than in Phase 2.

 Phase 4 studies involve post-marketing surveillance by collecting data on short-term and long-term effects.


ETHICAL ISSUES IN CLINICAL TRIALS

 Justification: Search for better treatment justifies clinical trials.

 Withholding a potentially beneficial treatment from the controls,

 Unknown risks of new agents,

 Lack of informed consent or consent under stress,

 Trials if an effective treatment exists,


ETHICAL ISSUES IN CLINICAL TRIALS con’t.

 Trial when one treatment is known to be better,

 Testing with no evidence of usefulness,

 Unscientific research,

 Violation of the normal doctor-patient relationship,

 Randomization when there is prior knowledge that one treatment is the better one,

 Failure to stop the study when harmful/beneficial effects appear.


HOW TO CONDUCT A CLINICAL TRIAL

 Find a sponsor because it is very expensive.

 Find (a) hospital (s) to carry out the study.

 Write an extensive protocol (detailed enough for others to carry it out).

o Study sample selection, randomization, inclusion, and exclusion,

o Intervention, outcome, adverse events reporting, safety monitoring

o statistical analysis, stopping rules, etc.


HOW TO CONDUCT A CLINICAL TRIAL, con’t.

 Consent: disclosure and signatures.

 Case report form (CFR) for data collection.

 Apply to IRB.

 Apply to SFDA.

 Register in the clinical trials register.