search this site.

101226P- ASSESSING ETHICS PRESENTARTIONS AT KSU

Print Friendly and PDFPrint Friendly

Dear Prof Al Faris

Assalam Alaykum

The following is the grading of the students based on their individual presentations and discussion of issues I posed to them not necessarily from their presentation but from ethics in general. Also attached is the attendance sheet. There are some students who presented for whom I did not get the ID numbers

1.  Suhaib Yaqub Niaz 428100373: preparation 8/10, presentation 9/10, discussion 8/10. In his presentation he defined consent linguistically and technically. He listed and explained the pillars (arkaan) of consent treating is as a contract. He then gave the legal basis for consent based on the contract. He also explained the conditions for validity of the consent.

2.  Muntasir al Mansuri 428100887: Preparation 8/10, presentation 8.5/10, discussion 6/10. He explained the legal ruling onn consent basing it on the obligation of treatment. He explained sanctions against a physician who treats a patient without consent.

3.  Salih Ahmad al Ahmadi 428100493: preparation 8.5/10, presentation 8/10, discussion 7.5/10. Discussed the classification of consent as general and restricted and as oral and written. The child, the insane, and the unconscious cannot consent and the wali consents for them. The relatives who act as wali are in the order of their nearness to the patient.

4.  Ahmad Bukhari: preparation 9/10, presentation 8/10, discussion 7/10. He discussed definition of a secret and types of secrets. Disclosing secrets is haram. Secrets are told to untrusted people. The best way to keep a secret is not to tell it.   

5.  Muadh 428100167: preparation 7.5/10, presentation 8/10, and discussion 7/10. He discussed the methods of keeping secrets. If asked about a secret you ignore or say you have a trust to keep. You may use ma'aridh or you can lie. You need to know what secrets to keep and what not to keep.

6.  Amir 428101595:  preparation 8/10, presentation 8/10, discussion 8/10. Secrets post mortem can be revealed or cannot be revealed depending on the situation. Secrets may be revealed to prevent a harm. Some secrets like zina or murder have to be revealed.  Revelation of the physician's error.

7.  Firas: preparation 8/10, presentation 8/10, discussion 7/10. He discussed patients rights to confidentiality. He also mentioned that physicians also have rights to respect, good treatment, justice, compensation, professional independence.

8.  Wael 428101132: preparation 8/10, presentation 7/10, discussion 8/10. Continued discussion of physician rights: good work environment, legal protection from unavoidable mistakes.

9.  Abd al Rahman: preparation 8/10, presentation 9/10, discussion 9/10. Continued discussion of physician rights: right to refuse treatment of a patient,  according to certain conditions: no discrimination and non emergency situations.