Presentation at a
training program ‘Applying the Principles of Ethics to Clinical Practice:’
held at Aramco Dhahran April 6, 2015 by Professor Omar Hasan Kasule Sr. MB
ChB (MUK). M{H (Harvard), DrPH (Harvard) Chairman of the Ethics Committee King
Fahad Medical City.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
To explore ethical issues concerning human fertility
and IVF.
Key words
IVF, stem cell therapy, infertility
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Definition of infertility
1.2 Social consequences of infertility
1.3 Treatment of infertility
1.4 Ethical and legal controversies
2.0 IN VIVO INSEMINATION
2.1 Definition of in vivo
insemination
2.2 Indications for in vivo insemination
2.3 Permissibility of in vivo
insemination
2.4 Prohibited in vivo insemination
3.0 IN VITRO FERTILIZATION
3.1 Definition of IVF
3.2 Indications for IVF
3.3 Permissible IVF
3.4 Prohibited IVF
4.0 DISPUTES ABOUT PARENTHOOD
4.1 Disputes about maternity
4.2 Disputes about paternity
4.3 Post-mortem parenthood
5.0 CIVIL TRANSACTIONS RELATING TO IVF
5.1 Costs associated with IVF
5.2 Inheritance
6.0 FROZEN SPERMS, OVA, and EMBRYOS
6.1 Storage
6.2 Frozen embryos
7.0 OTHER CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES
7.1 Masturbation
7.2 Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
7.3 Selective fetal reduction
7.4 Embryo splitting
7.5 Developing embryos for non-IVF
purposes
7.6 Using embryos for cloning
7.7 Mixing of gametes or embryos
7.8 Commercial trading in sperms,
gametes, or embryos
7.9 Use of gametes from cadavers or
post-mortem insemination or IVF
CASE DISCUSSION
The panel consists of the following
members:
·
A
Infertility Specialist who is concerned about the success rate at age 43
and the difficulties of raising a child as a 43 year-old single person.
·
A Counselor who is concerned about the
legalities of using donor sperm in IVF and the ethical dilemmas of embryo
cryopreservation for personal stem cell use in possibly 30 years.
·
An Obstetrician, who is also on the local
Research & Development Committee and who knows about twin pregnancy rates
after IVF and associated morbidity, and who is concerned about potential
litigation and anti-discrimination legislation.
·
A consumer advocate who has personal
conflicts with the patient and her capacity to pay for IVF as she has a low
income.
·
A scientist who would rather use excess
embryos for his research rather than to be stored for the patient's potential
stem cell needs.
Case 1:
An older single woman who wishes to have IVF, with
some embryos frozen for future stem cell therapy, as she has a family history
of Parkinson's Disease.
Case 2:
An infertile couple was in the midst of an IVF
procedure when the husband died soon after his semen was frozen. The wife
wanted to obtain the semen and have a baby by a surrogate mother. A former wife
also wanted the semen because she had a girl with leukemia who needed a
compatible bone marrow donor, preferably a sister.
Case 3:
A recently married woman continued taking oral
contraceptives prescribed for menstrual irregularities. Her husband wanted his
wife to discontinue her contraception because he wanted to start a family
immediately, but the wife refused.
Case 4:
A 14 year-old girl was admitted to the hospital for an
abortion. She was two months pregnant from what she claimed was rape. The
family was distraught and wanted the doctors to carry out the abortion
immediately. The physicians were reluctant because there was no medical reason.
Case 5:
A couple who had eight girls in successive pregnancies
desperately wished a boy. They decided to try IVF with selection of male
gametes. The obstetricians refused because there was no medical indication
since the couple had no problem in conceiving.
Case 6:
A child whose external appearance was female and had
been brought up as a girl was taken to the hospital at 14 years of age because
of delayed menstruation. The internal gonads and chromosomal patterns were
male. The parents wanted a gender reassignment operation to conform to the
genetic profile. The child refused to change from her familiar female identity.
Case 7:
A middle-aged woman without any medical condition
asked her physician for hormonal treatment to appear younger. The physician
refused because he judged the risk of cardiovascular and cancer complications
to be more than the benefits.
Case 8:
A 14 year-old girl with cancer requiring chemotherapy
was advised to have her ova removed and put in cold storage for the duration of
the treatment. Her parents refused the procedure because they did not believe
in IVF and she was not yet married.
REFERENCES
·
Whittaker A. Cross-border
assisted reproduction care in Asia: implications for access, equity and
regulations.Reprod Health Matters. 2011 May;19(37):107-16.
·
Scientific Advisory Committee of the
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Multiple
pregnancy following assisted reproduction.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2011
Mar;14(1):3-7.
·
NakhudaGS.Posthumous
assisted reproduction.SeminReprod Med. 2010 Jul;28(4):329-35.
·
Chatzinikolaou N. The
ethics of assisted reproduction.JReprodImmunol. 2010 May;85(1):3-8.
·
Lockwood GM. Social
egg freezing: the prospect of reproductive 'immortality' or a dangerous
delusion?Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Sep;23(3):334-40.
·
Klein JU, Sauer
MV. Ethics in egg donation: past, present, and future.SeminReprod Med.
2010 Jul;28(4):322-8.