search this site.

150406P - ETHICAL ISSUES IN RESOURCE ALLOCATION

Print Friendly and PDFPrint Friendly



Presentation at a training program ‘Applying the Principles of Ethics to Clinical Practice:’ held at Aramco Dhahran April 6, 2015 by Professor Omar Hasan Kasule Sr. MB ChB (MUK). MPH (Harvard), DrPH (Harvard) Chairman of the Ethics Committee King Fahad Medical City.


Basis for resource allocation (by Ghaiath MA Hussein PEER SCHS 2014)
·        CEA: (Effectiveness) - - priority given to those most likely to achieve a good outcome, i.e. Medical Success
·        Medical Need - - priority given to those most in need of medical intervention or those considered most helpless or generally neediest in society – vulnerable groups
·        Utility - - achieving the least morbidity/mortality possible given the resources available (maximizing good health/survival with the available resources)
·        Immediate Usefulness - - priority given to those with special skills that could be used to serve the common good in the immediate circumstance
·        General Social Value - - priority given to those who are considered by society to have the greatest social worth (past or future)

Basis for resource allocation (by Ghaiath MA Hussein PEER SCHS 2014)
·        Principle of Conservation - - priority given to those who use proportionally less resources
·        Responsibility for Dependents - - priority given to those who have primary responsibilities to dependents (parents, nursing home attendants, etc.)
·        None if not all - - no one should be saved if not all can be saved
·        Queue - - priority given on a first-come, first-served basis
·        Random Selection - - allocation determined by chance (a lottery, for example)
·        Ability to Pay - - priority given to those who can pay for the resources
·        Merit based - - priority given to those who have earned it due to past actions


Case scenario 1
Scenario: A 90-year old with multi organ failure and clinical signs of brain stem death on life support was occupying the last available bed in the ICU because the doctors were afraid to disclose death to the family that had many vocal and angry members. However when 50 survivors from an air crash site were brought it, the doctors decided to withdraw life support from the old man to free up at least one ICU bed.

Case scenario 2
A patient presented to the clinic with vague complaints in the abdomen and worries about cancer. Physical examination and investigations revealed no pathology.  The doctor was angry with the patient for wasting clinic time when he was in good health.  As the patient was leaving he told the doctor that his uncle had died the week before of stomach cancer. The doctor did not respond. What should the doctor have done? Provide your moral reasoning.