search this site.

150309P - ANALYSIS OF THE MEDICAL DECISIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL FIQH ACADEMY FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF THE MAQASID AL SHARI’AT AND QAWA’ID AL FIQH

Print Friendly and PDFPrint Friendly

Presented at the First International Bioethics Conference 8-10 March, 2015 by Professor Omar Hasan Kasule MB ChB (MUK), MPH (Harvard), DrPH (Harvard) Faculty of Medicine King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh.


SUMMARY 1
The paper presents results of a research project that consists of retrieval of medical fatwas from the website, summarizing/paraphrasing them in English using medical terminology, and assessing their conformity to maqasid al shariat and qawaid al fiqh as well as the necessities of empirical medical practice. 
The motivation of the research was to assess the viability of using maqasid and qawaid as guidelines to the medical professional in reaching robust conclusions about complicated ethico-legal issues that arise in practice.

SUMMARY 2
An assessment was made whether the conclusions reached by the Fiqh Academy in a period of 25 years could have been derived from the maqasid and qawaid.
The conclusion was that a series of axioms based on maqasid and qawa’id can be used as a reference by practitioners to form quick opinions on practical ethical issues. Ijtihad maqasidi is becoming popular and will be more popular in the foreseeable future. The paper recommends that a book of qawa’id for medical application be developed as a parallel to majallat al ahkaam al adliyyat in the commercial area.

CONCEPT OF MEDICAL ETHICS
The concept of medical ethics is misnomer from a strict Islamic perspective. The correct term should be medical jurisprudence because ethics is not an independent discipline but is part of fiqh.
Islamic Law is comprehensive encompassing positive law and morality.
The modern discipline of medical ethics arose in the European civilization as a necessity to deal with issues of a moral nature that the existing secularized laws could not handle because they lacked a moral dimension whose source is religion.

STAGES OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL FIQH
In the first period (0 to circa 1370H) it was derived directly from the Qur’an and sunnat.
In the second period (1370-1420) rulings on the many novel problems arising from drastic changes in medical technology were derived from secondary sources of the Law either transmitted (such as analogy, qiyaas, or scholarly consensus, ijma) or rational (such as istishaab, istihsaan, and istirsaal).
In the modern period, The failure of the tools of qiyaas to deal with many new problems led to the modern era (1420H onwards) characterized by use of the Theory of Purposes of the Law, maqasid al shari’at, to derive robust and consistent rulings. Ijtihad maqasidi is becoming popular and will be more popular in the foreseeable future.

EVOLUTION OF MAQASID AL SHARI’AT 2
Maqasid al shariat are like legal theory with the difference that they are developed from text whereas legal theory is developed from actual court cases.
Al Juwayni (d. 478H), in his book al Burhan proposed extensions to the methodology of qiyaas and also proposed general principles, qawaid.
AlGhazali (d. 505H) developed and systematized al Juwayni's ideas, proposed broad principles of maslahat, and introduced the term maqasid al shariat. He divided the maqasid into religious, maqasid diini, and earthly, mawasid duniyawi.

EVOLUTION OF MAQASID AL SHARI’AT 2
Each purpose has dual aspects: securing a benefit, tahsil, and preservation with prevention of harm, ibqa. The term ri'atyat al maqasid covers both tahsil and ibqa. Ibqa as mentioned above has both preservation and promotion.
Ghazzali divided the maqasid into three parts: necessities, dharurat; needs, hajiyat; and tawasu'u & taysiir. The third part has come to be known as embellishments, tahsinat. Some authors included maqasid al shariat under the general theme of ashbaah wa al nadhair.

EVOLUTION OF MAQASID AL SHARI’AT 2
The new theory of maqasid al shariat opened the way for further development of the flexible part of the Law and excited the interest of many jurists, the most famous being the Andalusian Maliki scholar Abu Ishaq al Shatibi.
Most of al Shatibi's work was an elaboration of the ideas proposed by Ghazzali. The new theory did not however lead to major practical changes because by that time the Islamic state was in decline and the flexible part of the law was in the hands of the political leaders and not the jurists.
A lot of books have been published on the maqasid in the past 20 years and include:


THE 5 MAQASID 1
Protection of diin (hifdh al ddiin)
Protection of life (hiffh al nafs)
Protection of lineage (hifdh al nasl)
Protection of the mind (hifdh al ‘aql)
Protection of wealth (hifdh al maal).

THE 5 MAQASID 2
Hifdh al nafs is the most commonly used in medicine.
Hifdh al nasl is invoked in reproductive matters (obstetrics and gynecology) as well as pediatrics.
Hifdh al ‘aql is invoked in psychiatry.
Hifdh al maal is invoked in health services administration in controlling medical care expenses.

EVOLUTION OF QAWA’ID AL FIQH 1
Qawaid al fiqh are legal axioms or legal codes.
This Qur'an and sunnat are comprehensive in the sense of providing general principles, qawa’id, that can be applied to specific situations.
These principles are either stated in the nass or are derived by inductive reasoning.
If we can derive these principles from the primary sources we can make the process of decision making easier even for the non-specialist.

EVOLUTION OF QAWA’ID AL FIQH 2: THE FIRST GENERATION
Qawaid existed and were used from the first generation. They were found in the concise but comprehensive sayings, jawamiu al kalim, of the prophet; sayings of the companions, athaar al sahabat, and the sayings of the followers, aqwaal al tabiin. Q
awaid were also found scattered in the earliest books of fiqh such as Kitaab al Kharaaj by Abu Yusuf Ya'aqub Ibn Ibrahim (d. 182H), Kitaab al Asl by Imaam Muhammad bin al Hasan al Shaybani (d. 189H), al Kitaab al Umm by Imaam al Shafie (d. 204H).
Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal also wrote some qawaid.

EVOLUTION OF QAWA’ID AL FIQH 2: THE STAGE OF DOCUMENTATION

Qawaid were scattered in the books of al Juwayni (d. 478H), Ibn Rushd the grandfather (d. 520H), al Nawawi (d. 676H), an Qarafi (d. 784H), Ibn Taymiyat (d. 728H), and Ibn al Qayyim (d. 751H).
The following authors collected and published qawa’id in dedicated books: Imaam Abu Tahir al Dabaas al Hanafi in the 4th century (d.   ), Imaam al Karakhi (d. 340H), al Dabuusi (d. 430H), al Subki (d. 771H), al Zarkashi (d. 794H), al Suyuti (d. 911H), Ibn Nujaim (d. 970H).


EVOLUTION OF QAWA’ID AL FIQH 2: THE STAGE OF ESTABLISHMENT AND COORDINATION
The majallat was published in 1285-1293H. The Majallat stated 99 basic qawa’id and expanded their applications to a total of 1790 qawa’id covering a wide array of issues in commercial transactions in the Hanafi school of law.
The Majallat is considered an effort in the controversial area of codifying the shari’at. Many commentaries and translations were made of the Majallat. 
Unfortunately this effort was not continued to its fruition in other areas of the Law because of the decline of the Ottoman state and its eventual overthrow by the European colonial powers who then went on to impose their legal codes on Muslim countries and marginalized the shari’at.


THE 5 MAIN QAWA’ID 1
There are 5 basic qawa’id also called al kulliyaat al khamasat. Many sub-principles can be derived from these.
The first principle is that of intention, qa’idat al qasd that states that an action is judged according to its underlying intention, qaidat al qasd,   al umuur bi maqasidiha (Majallat article No 2).
The second principle is that of certainty, qa’idat yaqiin, that states that certainty cannot be voided by a doubt, al yaqeen la yazuul bi al shakk (Majallat article No. 4). This principle is the basis for evidence-based knowledge and action.

THE 5 MAIN QAWA’ID 2
The third principle is the principle of hardship, qa’idat al mashaqqat, states that difficulty calls forth ease, mashaqqat tajlibu al tayseer (Majallat article No 17),  and  necessity makes the otherwise prohibited permissible, al dharuraat tubiihu al mahdhuuraat (Majallat article No 21). 
The fourth principle is that of injury or harm, qa’idat al dharar, is the most commonly invoked in medicine and defines the delicate balance between benefit, maslahat, and harm, mafsadat.
The fifth principle is that custom has the force of law, al ‘aadat muhakkamat.

QA’IDAT AL DHARAR: SUB PRINCIPLES 1
la dharar wa la dhiraar (Majallat article No 19).
Aldharar yuzaal (Majallat article No 20).
Al dharar la yuzaal bimithilihi (Majallat article No 25).
Yatahammalu al dharar al khaas li dafi al dharar al aam (Majallat article No. 26).

QA’IDAT AL DHARAR: SUB PRINCIPLES 1
Yukhtaar ahwan al dharrain (Majallat article No. 29)
al daharar al ashadd yuzaalu bi al daharar al akahaff  (Majallat article No 27)
idha taradha mufsidataan ruu’iya a’adhamuhuma dhararn bi irtikaab akhafyhuma (Majallat article No 28)
Dariu al mafaasid awal min jalbi al manafiu (Majallat article No. 30
ma haruma fi’iluhu haruma talabuhu (Majallat article No. 35)

THE INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC FIQH ACADEMY (IIFA) 1
IIFA is an organ of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) founded according to a decision of a meeting of the OIC held in Makka 25-28 January 1981.
IIFA members are fuqaha, ulama, thinkers in various fields of knowledge including fiqh, culture, science, and economics and from different parts of the world.
IIFA studies problems of contemporary life through ijtihad to reach solutions deriving from the Islamic heritage and open to developments of Islamic thought.


THE INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC FIQH ACADEMY (IIFA) 1
The first meeting of IIFA was 7-9 June 1983. IIFA holds a session every year in a different Muslim capital and discusses issues raised. These issues vary from year to year and cover all fields including medicine.
The first meeting was held in 1983 and the 21st meeting in 1435H.
IIFA recognized the importance of maqasid al shari’at in its resolution No No (18/5) 167 dated 9-14 July 2007 (see Table No 1) and defined their role in the methodology of its work.
There is evidence in the various decisions taken over the past quarter century of using maqasid and qawa’id but not systematically or uniformly


METHODS OF THE RESEARCH 1
Decisions of the Academy were retrieved from its website www.fiqhacademy.org.sa. They were translated with liberal paraphrasing and rearrangement by the author to make them easy to read in English. The preambles to the decisions and unnecessary details were eliminated. The background research papers on which these decisions were based were not included in the analysis.
The decisions were tabulated showing which qai’dat or maqsad applied to each. Where relevant the number of the qa’idat in the majallat was provided.

METHODS OF THE RESEARCH 2
An explanation was made how in the author’s view that qa’idat or maqsad explained the decision.
An overall assessment was made on each decision in terms of its consistency with his understanding of maqasid al shariát, applicable qawa'id al fiqh, and medical practice.
The source of maqasidf ak shariat by the classical book of Abu Ishaq al Shatibi, al muwafaqqat fi usul al shari’at. The source of qawa’id was the majallat al ahkaam al adliyyat.

PHYSICIAN LIABILITY 1:
Making the physician liable for malpractice errors protects life (hifdh al nafs) and prevents harm (dharar).
The harm to the patient may be physical such as wrong medication or psychological such as disclosing confidential medical information
Physician malpractice may be intended or may be due to lack of knowledge or skill
Physician liability arises if there is a contract with the patient with the exception of emergency situations
Malpractice may be an error of commission or an error of omission.

PHYSICIAN LIABILITY 2:
The physician in direct contact with the patient, al mubashir, is liable although another physician contributed to the error according to the principle, Idha ijatam al mubashir wa al mutasabbib yudhaafu al hukm ila al mubaashir (Majallat article No.  90).
Yudhaafu al fi’ilu lia al faa’ili la al aamir ma lam yakun mujbiran (Majallat article No.  89)

CONSENT 1:
The patient has his best interests at heart and has to decide on medical procedures to protect life (hifdh al nafs) and prevent harm (dharar)
If the patient is not competent the next of kin is the best placed to protect the interests of the patient as the legal guardian (wakiil) (Majallat article No. 1449).
If there is no next of kin the government authority assumes the duty of legal guardian. In the present of the next of kin the government cannot make decisions because private guardianship (wilayat khaasat) is stronger than public guardianship (wilaayat ‘aamat) (Majallat article No. 59).
The government can order treatment and other measures to contain an epidemic without individual consent because public interest (maslahat ‘aamat). There must be a real benefit associated with this intervention, Al tasarruf fi al ra’yat manuutu bi al maslahat (Majallat article No 58).

CONSENT 2:
Treatment can be given without consent in a life-saving emergency because of necessity since necessities make the forbidden permissible (al dharurat tubiihu al mahdhuuraat ) (Majallat article No 21).
Consent for research has more consideration than consent for treatment because the benefit is not assured and the risks are unknown.
Consent for vulnerable research subjects like prisoners and the destitute may not be valid if coercion is involved even if indirectly
Consent can be written or verbal al kitaab ka al khitaab (Majallat article No 69)
Silence does not imply consent (la yunsab li saakitin qawl) (Majallat article No. 67)

CLINICAL PRACTICE
Rulings on treatment are based on the benefit-risk ratio which reflects the balance of protecting life (hifdh al nafs) and preventing harm (dharar).
Treatment is obligatory (wajib) or recommended (manduub) if non-treatment will lead to body injury or impairment. It is offensive (makruh) if side effects of the treatment are worse than the disease.
In conditions of necessity in the absence of a female physician, a male can treat a female because necessity makes the prohibited permissible (Majallat article No 21). The exposure of nakedness should not be more than the minimum necessary because al dharuraat tuqaddar bi qadariha (Majallat article No 22)
Presence of a chaperone prevents harm of transgression or suspicion

SAUM FOR THE PATIENT
Permissibility of a wide range of medications and surgical procedures in Ramadhan is based on the principle of certainty (yaqiin) that they do not introduce nutritious material into the alimentary canal (aljawf).
If treatment can wait it is better to postpone it to the night since there is no dharurat to break the saum

ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY DISEASE SYNDROME (AIDS)
Measures are taken to prevent spread of infection to the spouse to others.
Spouses can separate to prevent spread of infection because hifdh al nafs is higher in consideration than hifdh al nasl
Patients need not be isolated because there is no yaqiin that the infection can spread through casual contact
Deliberate spread of the infection violates hifdh al nafs and is a punishable crime
Pregnancy is not terminated if the mother is infected for hifdh al nafs of the fetus
An infected mother can nurse her baby because there is no yaqiin of infection through the milk
AIDS is considered a terminal illness because there is no yaqiin evidence of recovery from it

REPRODUCTION ETHICS 1
Public laws restricting the couple’s reproductive choices are not permissible because it contacts the purpose of hifdh al nasl
Permanent sterilization of men and women is not permissible because it contracts the purpose of hifdh al nasl but it can be permissible for a legal necessity, dharurat
Temporary contraception is permissible with methods that do not cause harm (dharar) or destruction of life (hifdh al nafs) and with mutual agreement of the two spouses

REPRODUCTION ETHICS 2
Non-permissibility of in vivo and in vitro fertilization involving sperm or ovum donation or use of a surrogate uterus because of contravening the purpose of lineage (hifdh al nasl or hifdh al nasab)
No extra ova should be fertilized in IVF procedures to avoid their destruction that is against the purpose of hifdh al nafs
Extra fertilized ova should not be implanted in a strange woman because that contradicts the purpose of hifdh al nasl

END OF LIFE ETHICS
The definition of terminal illness (maradh al mawt) is according to ‘urf involving physician assessment, treatment availability, and the nature of the disease.
Definition of legal death depends on urf and the yaqiin of non-reversible cardio-respiratory arrest or non-reversible brain death
Permissibility of withdrawing life support in case of yaqiin of death as defined above
It is better not to start artificial life support in futile cases because it is a difficult decision to withdraw it later according to the principle,
Al baqau ashalu min al ibtida (Majallat article No 56) OR yughtafar fi al baqaau ma la yughtafar fi al ibtida (Majallat article No 55).

TRANSPLANTATION 1
Transplantation is permissible if there is yaqiin of benefit (maslaha) for the recipient and minimal risk (dharar) for the recipient and living donor
Permissibility of transplanting organs, tissues, and cells from animals, dead humans, naturally aborted fetuses because of maslaha for the recipient and no dharar for living humans
Non permissibility of transplanting from living fetuses, unencephalic living infants, or terminally ill fetuses because it contradicts hifdh al nafs

TRANSPLANTATION 2
Trade in transplant organs is non permissible will result in harm (dharar) for the poor and weak in society
Non permissibility of transplanting ovaries and testes because it contradicts hifdh al nasal / hifdh al nasab. Transplantation of other reproductive organs in allowed under necessity daharurat because they do not carry hereditary characteristics

HEREDITY AND GENETICS
Human cloning is non permissible because it violates hifdh al nasl. Cloning of organs and tissues is allowed under necessity dharurat
Cloning is permissible in plants, animals, and microorganisms if there is benefit (maslaha) and no harm (mafsadat)

PRINCIPLES OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
Respect for autonomy of the research subject to consent (hifdh al nafs) and prevent harm (dharar)
Benefit (maslahat)
Ihsan
Justice

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Maqasid and qawaid cannot be used when there is nass, la massagh li alijtihad fi mawrid al nass (Majallat article 14).
Maqasid and qawa’id are not daliil but are a guide to systematic thinking
A book of principles in medicine similar to majallat in the commercial area is needed
Systematic analysis of all medical procedures existing and anticipated instead of waiting for a problem to arise and a fatwa is asked


TABLE 1: DECISION NO (18/5) 167 DATED 9-14 JULY 2007 ON MAQASID AL SHARI’AT AND THEIR ROLE IN DERIVATION OF LEGAL RULINGS
1.      Maqasidf al shari’at are general meanings and wisdoms as well as objectives that the lawgiver aimed at fulfilling in legislation to assure benefits on earth and in the hereafter
2.      The roles of maqasid in ijtihad are: (a) comprehensive view of the legal texts and rulings (b) Maqasid al shariat  are considered the murajih that must be differences among scholars (c) tabassur of consequences of actions of mukallifiin and to apply shariat rulings on them
3.      Maqasid al shari’at in their different levels are the basic and suitable context for human rights
4.      Maqasid al shari’at are important in in ijtihad
5.      Correct use of maqasid does not yu’attil the dalaalat al nussus al shar’iyat and correct ijma
6.      It is importance  to study the different dimensions of maqasid al shari’at in the social, economic, educational, political fields etc
7.      Iistihdhaar maqasid al shariat has an impact in sadiid understanding of the shariat discourse
8.      Use of maqasid al shari’at is important in applying shariat rulings on the realities, novelties of contemporary financial transactions in order to assure tamayuz in formulating Islamic products and their independence from traditional formulations

TABLE 2: MEETINGS OF IIFA

TABLE 3: PHYSICIAN ETHICS AND LIABILITY

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Physician ethics, responsibilities, and liabilities


80 (11/8)[1] Session 8 Brunei 21-27 June 1993
Postpone the decision to the next session
N/A
N/A
Physician liability


142 (8/15) Session 15 Muscat 14-19 March 2004
1. Physician liability for patient injury is considered in the following situations: causing intentional injury, physician ignorance or lack of skill, lack of registration or accreditation from the official body, treatment without the consent of the patient or the legal guardian, patient deception, practice not according to professional standards, negligence, disclosure of patient confidentiality with no valid reason, failure to provide emergency life-saving treatment
Dharar
nafs
2. Physician liability can be jaza’iyat?
Dharar
nafs
3. Each member of the team is responsible for his error and the head is carries vicarious responsibility for errors of his subordinates
Dharar
nafs
4. The hospital or institution is liable if it did not fulfill its responsibilities or gave wrong instructions

Dharar
nafs

TABLE 4: ETHICS OF CONSENT

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Consent to treatment
67 (5/7)[1]- Session 7 Jeddah 9-14 May 1992
Competent patient makes treatment decisions
Legal guardian makes decisions for incompetent patients
Qa’idat al dharar
nafs
Legal guardian decision is disregarded if not in the interests of the patient and another guardian or the government makes the decisions
Qa’idat al dharar
nafs
The government can order compulsory treatment and preventive measures in cases of infectious diseases
Qa’idat al dharar
nafs
Emergency treatment can be provided without patient consent

Qa’idat al dharar
nafs
Consent for emergency surgery
(18/10) 172 Session 18 Putrajaya 9-14 July 2007 pages 28-29
1. Permissibility of medical interventions in emergency situations without consent of the patient or the legal guardian in the following cases: (a) patient is unconscious (b) The patient is in a critical consition requiring immediate intervention and time is of essence (c) There is no next of kin present to make the decision

Qa’idat al dharar

nafs
2. Conditions for intervention in emergency cases are: (a) The treatment must be approved and known in that speciality (b) Presence of a specialist in a team of 3 physicians who make the decision to investigate and treat and who sign a report about this (c) the benefit of the intervention must exceed its harm (d) all details are disclosed to the patient when he regains consciousness (e) treatment must either be free but if payment is meeded it must be fixed by a specialized authority

Qa’idat al dharar
Nafs
Consent for emergency surgery
(19/10) 184 Session 10 Shariqat 26-20 April 2009 pages 29-30



Consent to research
67 (5/7)[1]- Session 7 9-14 May 1992
Consent of competent research subjects or their legal guardian  is needed avoiding situations of quasi compulsion such as prisoners and the poor

Qa’idat al dharar
nafs


TABLE 5: CLINICAL PRACTICE ETHICS

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Seeking medical treatment
67 (5/7)[1]- Session 7 9-14 May 1992
1. Obligatory (wajib) if non-treatment will lead to 1. harm to the body or a its parts to prevent bodily harm 2. spread of infectious disease
Dharar
nafs
2. Recommended (manduub) if non-treatment will impair the body to a degree lesser than described in 1 above.
Dharar
nafs
3. Permissible (mubaah) if 1 and 2 above do not apply
Dharar
nafs
4. Offensive (makruh) if side effects of treatment  are worse than the disease
Dharar
nafs
A male physician treating a female patient
81 (12/8)[1] - Session 8 Brunei 21-27 June 1993
1. The order of priority of the treating physician is: a Muslim female then a non-Muslim trustworthy female, then a Muslim male, then a non Muslim male
Dharar
nafs
2. Only the minimum necessary exposure of nakedness is permissible accompanied by lowering the gaze
Dharar
nafs
3. A husband or relative or a trusted woman must attend the treatment session to avoid khalwat
Dhara
nafs
Cosmetic  surgery
(18/11) 172 Session 18 Putrajaya 9-14 July 2007 page 32-39
1. Definition: Cosmetic surgery improves (tahsin) or corrects (ta’adiiil) the shape or restores function  of any external part or parts of the body
2. Regulations and conditions of cosmetic surgery: (a) fulfill a legally recognized objective such as restoring function, correcting a defect, or returning the body to its natural state (b) the surgery should not result in injury more than the expected benefit and thus is determined by the specialists (c) the surgery must be carried out by a specialized and qualified physician (d) the patient must consent to the surgery (e) the physician must disclose the risks and side effects expected (e) there is no alternative treatment with less intervention on the body (f) the surgery should not violate any text of the shari’at such as the prohibition of tattooing (g) observance of the rules of treatment such as prohibition  of khalwat and exposure of nakedness except as necessary (dharurat)
3. Legal rulings: cosmetic surgery is permissible for dharurat and haajiyat with the aim of (a)  restoring the original structure (b) restoring function (c) correcting congenital malformations (d) correcting acquitred malformations such as scars from burns (e) removal of damaamat that annoys psychologically or physically
4. It is not permissible to undertake cosmetic surgery to change natural creation with no medical indication
5. Weight reduction by surgery is permissible
6. It is not permissible to remove taja’iid by surgery or injection
7. It is permissible to repair a hymen torn by accident or rape
dharar
Nafs

TABLE 6: SAUM BY THE PATIENT

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Permissible medication and medical procedures that do not break saum
93 (1/10)[1] – Session 10 Jeddah 28 June – 3 July 1997
1. Eye drops, ear drops, ear irrigation, nose drops, nose inhalers, sub-lingual pills provided they do not get swallowed and reach the oropharynx:
2. Gynecological procedures: vaginal examination by hand or scope, entry of fluids into the vagina, entry of a scope into the uterus, fluids or scopes and catheters or medications in the ureter,
3. Surgical procedures: catheterization of arteries, abdominal laparascopy, liver biopsy, intestinal scope with no lubricants, entry of material into the brain or the spinal cord
4. Oral / dental procedures:  drilling or cleaning or brushing teeth, mouthwash or oral inhalation
5. Non nutritious or hydrating subcutaneous, intravenous, or intramuscular injections
6. Preparations absorbed through the skin
7. Oxygen and anesthetic gases
8. Unintended vomiting

Yaqin
Dharar
nafs
Delay of treatment into the night
93 (1/10)[1] – Session 10 Jeddah 28 June – 3 July 1997
2. Muslim physician should advise delay of  above medications and procedures where possible until after breaking the saum
Dharar
ddiin
Medication and saum
(18/12)174 Session 18 Putra jaya 9-14 July 2007 page 33
Completion of the discussion of muftiraat was postponed to the nest session


Diabetes mellitus and saum
162 (11/17) – Session 17 Amman 24-28 June 2004

Postpone


Diabetes mellitus and saum
(19/9) 183 – Session 19 Shariqat 26-30 April 2009 pages 24-28





TABLE 7:  ACQUIRED IMMUNODEFICIENCY SYNDROME

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
82 (13/8)[1]- Session 8 Brunei 21-27 June 1993
Obligation on the infected spouse to inform the partner and both cooperate in all preventive measures
Dharar
nafs
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
90 (7/9)[1] Session 9 Abudhabi 1-6 April 1995
1. It is not obligatory to isolate affected patients but medical precautions are taken to avoid infection

Dharar
nafs
2. Deliberate spread of infection in the general community is punished under the laws of hiraba
Dharar
nafs
3. Deliberate attempt to infect an individual is punished by a disciplinary punishment.
Dharar
nafs
4. Deliberate infection of an individual is punished by a disciplinary punishment if the victim does not die. If the victim dies capital punishment may be considered
Dharar
nafs
5.  It is not permissible to terminate pregnancy if the mother is infected
Dharar
nafs
6. It is permissible for an affected mother to care for and breast feed her baby
Dharar
nafs
7.  A spouse has the right to separation from an infected partner
Dharar
nafs
8. AIDS is considered terminal illness



TABLE 8:  REPRODUCTIVE ETHICS

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Family planning
39 (1/5)[1]. Session 5. Kuwait. 10-15 December 1988.
1. Non permissibility of a public law restricting a couple’s reproductive choices

nasl
2. Non permissibility of sterilization in men and women without a legal necessity (dharurat)

nasl
3. Permissibility of reversible contraception for purposes of child spacing or for another legal reason if the husband and wife mutually agree and the methods used do not cause injury or termination of pregnancy
Dharar

Test-tube babies
5 (5/2)[1], Session 2, Jeddah 22-28 December 1985
Postpone decision to the next session while the medical and fiqhi issues involved are studied


16 (4/3)[1], Session 3 Amman 11-16 October 1986
Non permissibility of IVF using a husband’s sperm, a donated ovum from a strange woman, and implantation in the wife

Nasl (nasab)
Non permissibility of IVF using donated sperm from a strange man, the wife’s ovum, and implantation in the wife

Nasl (nasab)
Non permissibility of IVF using the husband’s sperm, the wife’s ovum, and implantation in a strange woman

Nasl (nasab)
Non permissibility of IVF using donated sperm from a strange man, donated ovum from a strange woman, and implantation in the wife

Nasl (nasab)
Non permissibility of IVF using the husband’s sperm, the wife’s ovum, and implantation in the co-wife

Nasl (nasab)
Permissibility of IVF using the husband’s sperm, the wife’s ovum, and implantation in the same wife

Nasl (nasab)
Permissibility of in vivo insemination by injecting the husband’s sperm in the vagina or uterus of the wife

Nasl (nasab)
Extra / unused fertilized ova
55 (6/6)[1] – Session 6 Jeddah 14-20 March 1990
1. Only the minimum needed number of ova should be fertilized in every cycle.

nafs
2. Any extra fertilized ova should be left with no extra medical care until they expire naturally

nafs
3. non permissibility of implanting fertilized ova into another woman and precautions must be taken to prevent this from happening.

nasl
Breast milk banks
: [1[ (2/6?6 Session 2, Jeddah 22-28 December 1985
1. Prohibition of establishing breast milk banks.

Nasl
2. Prohibition of feeding from milk banks

nasl

TABLE 9:  END OF LIFE ETHICS

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Terminal illness
[1] (7/5) 67 Session 7 Jeddah 9-14 May 1992
1. Definition of terminal illness depends on the physician assessment, treatment availability, and the nature of the disease

Urf
nafs
Artificial life support
7 (7/2)[1]. Session 2, Jeddah 22-28 December 1985
Postpone decision to the next session and study the decisions of the International Islamic Medical Organization.


17 (5/3)[1]. Session 3, Amman 11-16 October 1986
1. Legal death is defined as 1. complete non-reversible cessation of cardiac and respiratory function 2. Complete non-reversible cessation of functions and start of brain tissue death
Urf

2. Permissibility of withdrawing artificial life support in a dead person as defined above
Yaqiin
Nafs
maal

TABLE 10: TRANSPLANTATION ETHICS

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Solid organ transplantation
26 (1/4)[1]. Session 4. Jeddah 6-11 February 1988.
Permissibility of Auto-transplantation
Dharar
nafs
Permissibility of hetero transplantation from a living or deceased donor if there is consent from a  living donor or relatives of a dead donor consent, there is no impairment of major bodily functions in the living donor, there is no sale of organs,
Dharar
nafs
Brain and neural system cell transplantation

54 (5/6)[1]. Session 6. Jeddah. 14-20 March 1990.
Permissibility of auto transplantation
Dharar
nafs
Permissibility of transplantation from animal fetuses
Dharar
nafs
Permissibility of transplanting neural tissue from naturally aborted fetuses
Dharar
Nafs
nasl
Permissibility of transplanting brain cells grown outside the body if they were obtained legally
Dharar
nafs
Non permissibility of harvesting cells from a living normal fetus
Dharar
nafs
Non permissibility to harvest neural tissue from a living unencephalic infant
Dharar
nafs
Fetuses as sources of transplant organs
 56 (7/6)[1] – Session 6 Jeddah 14-20 March 1990
1. Non permissibility of using living fetuses as sources of transplant organs
Dharar
nafs
2. Permissibility of transplanting organs from dead fetuses from natural abortions or pregnancy termination to save the life of the mother

nafs
3. Non permissibility of transplanting organs from terminally ill living fetuses

nafs
Trade in transplant organs
56 (7/6)[1] – Session 6 Jeddah 14-20 March 1990
Non permissibility of trade  in organ transplantation processes
Dharar
nafs
Control of transplantation
56 (7/6)[1] – Session 6 Jeddah 14-20 March 1990
Organ transplantation must be under a trusted specialized body
Dharar

Transplantation of reproductive organs
57 (8/6)[1] Session 6. Jeddah. 14-20 March 1990.
1. Non permissibility of transplanting the two reproductive internal gonads (ovary and the testes) because they carry hereditary characteristics of the donor.

nasl
2. Permissibility of transplantation of reproductive organs that do not carry hereditary characteristics with the exception of the male and female external gonads under conditions of necessity and conditions defined in decision no. (4/1) 26.

nasl
Transplantation of organs from criminals condemned to death or organ removal in retribution
58 (9/6)[1] Session 6. Jeddah. 14-20 March 1990.
Non permissibility of re-attachment in the victim of an organ removed as hadd punishment

nafs
Non permissibility of re-attachment of an organ removed as or retribution (qisas) except if the victim of the crime agrees or has his organ reattached

nafs
Permissibility of reattachment of an organ removed by error either in the judicial decision or during execution of the punishment
Dharar
nafs

TABLE 11: HEREDITY AND GENETICS

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Human cloning
94 (2/10)[1] - Session 10 Jeddah 28 June – 3 July 1997
1. Non permissibility of human cloning

Qa’idat ak qasd
Qaidat ak dharar

2. If the law above  is broken and human cloning is carried, legal opinions will be expressed on the consequences of the violation


3. Non permissibility of a third party involvement in the marital relationship such as a surrogate uterus, donated ovum, donated sperm, or skin cell for cloning

Hifdh al nasl (nasab)
4. Permissibility of use of cloning and genetic engineering technology in plants, microorganisms and animals to get benefits and relieve harm
Dharar
nasal
5. Call upon Muslim countries to pass laws forbidding experiments leading to human cloning
Dharar
nasal
Heredity, genetic engineering, and the human genome
105(8/11)[]- Session 11 Manama 14-19 November 1998

Postpone decisions


Heredity, genetic engineering, and the human genome
(20/8) 193 Session 20 Algiers 13-18 September 2012 page 17
Postpone to the next session.


Heredity, genetic engineering, and the human genome
(21/9)203 Session 21 Riyadh 18-22 November 2013
1. The following conditions must be observed in using the genome: (a) use the genome in useful and not dangerous or illegal purposes (b) genome-based diagnosis or treatment must be preceded by evaluation of benefits and risks (c) consent must be obtained from the patient or the legal guardian (d) everybody has the right to decide to receive or not receive information about his genome (e) confidentiality and disclosure only with patient permission (f) no discrimination on the basis of genetic information (g) no genetic research violating Islamic law will be allowed
2. permissibility of treatment using somatic cells
3.  Non permissibility of using sex cells in treatment
4. Genetic engineering is not permissible for humans but is permissible for plants and animals
5. Genetic counseling is permissible
6. Genetic diagnosis: genetic survey is permitted ubder certain conditions. Genetic diagnosis is permissible before marriage, before implantation, prenatally and post natally.



TABLE 12: MISCELLANEOUS

Category of decision
Decision number, Session, date, and venue
IIFA Decision
Qawaid basis
Maqasid basis
Principles Biomedical research
161 (10/17) – Session 17 24-28 June 2006
1. The general principles for research are: respect for persons so that no research is carried out without the consent of the research subject or the legal guardian 2. Benefit, maslahat
3. Justice
4. Ihsan
Qa’idat al dharar
Hifdh al naafs
Health insurance
149 (7/16) – Session 16 9-14 April 2005
1. Permissibility of direct insurance by the treating institution
Qa’idat al dharar
Hifdh al naafs
Hifdh al maal
2. Permissibility of cooperative or social insurance
Qa’idat al dharar
Hifdh al naafs
Hifdh al maal
3. Non permissibility of commercial insurance
Qa’idat al qasd
Qa’idat al yaqeen
Qa’idat al dharar
Hifdh al naafs
Hifdh al maal