Home 
Contact 
Profile 
Videos 
Paper presented by Professor Omar Hasan Kasule Sr. MB ChB (MUK), MPH (Harvard), DrPH (Harvard) Professor of Epidemiology and Islamic Medicine at the Institute of Medicine University of Brunei and Visiting Professor of Epidemiology at University Malaya WEB: http://omarkasule.tripod.com at the Scientific and Islamic Medicine Seminar organized by the Students’ Executive Board Faculty of Medicine Deponegoro University held on Sunday 19th October 2008n at the Central Java Governors’ Hall Semarang Java Timur Indonesia
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the main elements of proper behavior and etiquette by a Muslim physician
1.0 PHYSICIAN ETIQUETTE, adab al tabiib
1.1 Good doctor etiquette with patients and their families’
Bed-side visits
The physician-patient interaction is both professional and social. The bedside visit fulfills the brotherhood obligation of visiting the sick. The human relationship with the patient comes before the professional technical relationship. It involves reassurance, psychological and social support, show of fraternal love, and sharing. A psychologically satisfied patient is more likely to be cooperative in taking medication, eating, or drinking. The following are recommended during a visit: greeting the patient, dua for the patient, good encouraging words, asking about the patient’s feelings, doing good/pleasing things for the patient, making the patient happy, and encouraging the patient to be patient, discouraging the patient from wishing for death, nasiihat for the patient, and reminding the patient about dhikr. Caregivers should seek permission, idhn, before getting to the patient. They should not engage in secret conversations that do not involve the patient.
Etiquette of the care-giver
The caregiver should respect the rights of the patient regarding advance directives on treatment, privacy, access to information, informed consent, and protection from nosocomial infections. Caregivers must be clean and dress appropriately to look serious, organized and disciplined. They must be cheerful, lenient, merciful, and kind. They must enjoin the good, have good thoughts about the patients and avoid evil or obscene words. They must observe the rules of lowering the gaze, and seclusion. Caregivers must have an attitude of humbleness. They cannot be emotionally-detached in the mistaken impression that they are being professional. They must be loving and empathetic and show mercifulness but the emotional involvement must not go to the extreme of being so engrossed that rational professional judgment is impaired. They must make dua for the patients because qadar can only be changed by dua. They can make ruqya for the patients by reciting the two mu’awadhatain or any other verses of the Qur’an.
Caregivers must seek permission when approaching or examining patients. Medical care must be professional, competent, and considerate. Medical decisions should consider the balance of benefits and risks. The general position of the Law is to give priority to minimizing risk over maximizing benefit. Any procedures carried out must be explained very well to the patient in advance. The caregiver must never promise cure or improvement. Every action of the caregiver must be preceded by basmalah. Everything should be predicated with the formula inshallah, if Allah wishes. The caregivers must listen to the felt needs and problems of the patients. They should ask about both medical and non-medical problems. Supportive care such as nursing care, cleanliness, physical comfort, nutrition, treatment of fever and pain are as important as the medical procedures themselves and are all what can be offered in terminal illness. Caregivers must reassure the patients not to give up hope. Measures should be taken to prevent nosocomial infections.
Etiquette of interaction between genders
Both the caregiver and patient must cover awrat as much as possible. However, the rules of covering are relaxed because of the necessity, dharurat, of medical examination and treatment. The benefit of medical care takes precedence over preventing the harm inherent in uncovering awrat. When it is necessary to uncover awrat, no more than what is absolutely necessary should be uncovered. To avoid any doubts, patients of the opposite gender should be examined and treated in the presence of others of the same gender. The caregivers should be sensitive to the psychological stress of patients, including children, when their awrat is uncovered. They should seek permission from the patient before they uncover their awrat. Caregivers who have never been patients may not realize the depth of the embarrassment of being naked in front of others.
Medical co-education involves intense interaction between genders: Teacher-student, student-student, and teacher-teacher. Interacting with colleagues of the opposite gender raises special problems: norms of dress, speaking, and general conduct; class-room etiquette; social interaction; laboratory experiments on fellow students; learning clinical skills by examining other students; and the operation theatre. Medical personnel of opposite genders should wear gender-specific garments during surgical operations because Islam frowns on any attempt to look like the opposite gender. Shari’at guidelines on interaction with patients of the opposite gender should be followed. Taking history, physical examination, diagnostic procedures, and operations should preferably be by a physician of the same gender. In conditions of necessity a physician of the opposite gender can be used and may have to look at the ‘awrat or touch a patient. The conditions that are accepted as constituting dharuurat are: skills and availability. The preference between a Muslim of opposite gender vs non-Muslim of same gender depends on the local situation.
Dealing with the family
Visits by the family fulfill the social obligation of joining the kindred and should be encouraged. The family are honored guests of the hospital with all the shari’at rights of a guest. The caregiver must provide psychological support to family because they are also victims of the illness because they are anxious and worried. They need reassurance about the condition of the patient within the limits allowed by the rules of confidentiality. The family can be involved in some aspects of supportive care so that they feel they are helping and are involved. They should however not be allowed to interrupt medical procedures. Caregivers must be careful not to be involved in family conflicts that arise from the stresses of illness.
1.2 Good doctor etiquette in the health care team
Etiquette of teaching & learning in the health care team
The hospital health care team is complex and multi-disciplinary with complementary and inter-dependent roles. Members have dual functions of teaching and delivering health care. Most teaching is passive learning of attitudes, skills, and facts by observation. Teachers must be humble. They must make the learning process easy and interesting. Their actions, attitudes, and words can be emulated. They should have appropriate emotional expression, encourage student questions, repeat to ensure understanding, and not hide knowledge. The student should respect the teacher for the knowledge they have. They should listen quietly and respectfully, teach one another, ask questions to clarify, and take notes for understanding and retention. They should stay around in the hospital and with their teachers all the time to maximize learning.
Etiquette of care delivery in the health care team
Each member of the team carries personal responsibility with leaders carrying more responsibility. Leaders must be obeyed except in illegal acts, corruption, or oppression. Rufaidah, the first Muslim nurse, was a good model of etiquette. She was kind, empathetic, a capable leader and organizer, clinically competent, and a trainer of others. Besides clinical activities, she was a public health nurse and a social worker assisting all in need. The human touch is unfortunately being forgotten in modern medicine as the balance is increasingly tilted in favor of technology.
The health care team: general group dynamics
Basic duties of brotherhood and best of manners must be observed. Encouraged are positive behaviors (mutual love, empathy, caring for one another; leniency, generosity, patience, modesty, a cheerful disposition, calling others by their favorite names, recognizing the rights of the older members, and self control in anger. Discouraged are negative attributes (harshness in speech, rumor mongering, excessive praise, mutual jealousy, turning away from other for more than 3 days, and spying on the privacy of others).
The health care team: special group dynamics
Gender-specific identity should be maintained in dress, walking, and speaking. Free mixing of the genders is forbidden but professional contact within the limits of necessity is allowed. Patients of the opposite gender are examined in the presence of a chaperone. The gaze should be lowered. Modest covering must be observed. Display of adornments that enhance natural beauty must be minimized.
1.3 Doctor misconduct’
Abuse of professional privileges
Un-ethical research on patients is abuse of professional privileges. Abuse of treatment privileges consists of unnecessary treatment, iatrogenic infection, and allowing or abetting an unlicensed practitioner. Abuse of prescription privileges is manufacturing, possessing, and supplying a controlled drug without a license, prescription of controlled drugs not following procedures, diverting or giving away controlled substances, dispensing harmful drugs, sale of poisons, and writing prescriptions using secret formulas.
Financial fraud may be pharmacy fraud (billing for medicine not supplied), billing fraud (billing for services not performed), equipment fraud (using equipment that is really not needed or using equipment of poorer quality), or supplies fraud. It is also illegal to get financial advantage from prescriptions to be filled by pharmacies owned by the physician. Kick-backs are unethical and illegal. False or inaccurate documentation is a breach of the law and includes issuing a false medical certificate of illness, false death certification, and false injury reports.
Court action could be brought against a physician for the following crimes against the person: manslaughter (voluntary & involuntary); euthanasia (active and passive): battery for forced feeding or treatment; criminal liability for patient death; induced non-therapeutic abortion; iatrogenic death; abusive therapy involving torture; intimate therapy; rape and child molestation; and sexual advances to patients or sexual involvement. The physician-patient relation requires that the physician keeps all information about the patient confidential. Breach of confidentiality can be done only in the following situations: court order, statutory duty to report notifiable diseases, statutory duty to report drug use, abortions, births, deaths, accidents at work, disclosure to relatives in the interest of the patient, disclosure in the public interest, sharing information with other health professionals, disclosure for the purposes of teaching and research, and disclosure for the purposes of health management.
Private mis-conduct derogatory to reputation, kharq al muru’at
Breach of trust is a cause for censure because a physician must be a respected and trusted member of the community. Sexual misbehavior such as zina and liwaat are condemned. Fraudulent procurement of a medical license, sale of medical licenses, and covering an unqualified practitioner indicate bad character. Physicians can abuse their position by abuse of trust (eg harmful or inappropriate personal and sexual relations with patients and their families), abuse of confidence (eg disclosure of secrets), abuse of power/influence (eg undue influence on patients for personal gain), and conflict of interest (when the physician puts personal selfish interests before the interests of the patient). Other forms of misconduct are in-humane behavior such as participation in torture or cruel punishment, abuse of alcohol and drugs, behavior unbecoming, indecent behavior, violence, and conviction for a felony.
Public professional mis-conduct
Physicians in private practice must adopt good business practices. Halal transactions are praised[1]. An honest businessman is held in high regard[2]. Leniency in transactions is encouraged[3]. Full disclosure is needed in any transaction[4]. Measures and scales must be fulfilled[5]. Bad business practices are condemned. There is no blessing in immoral earnings[6]. Selling over another’s sale is prohibited[7]. Cheating is condemned[8]. Also condemned are financial fraud including criminal breach of trust, riba on bills, fee splitting, and bribery[9]. Sale of goodwill of a practice is allowed. Also allowed is agreement among partners that they will not set up a rival practice on leaving the partnership. Entering into a compact with pharmacists or laboratories involving fee splitting and unnecessary referrals is not moral. Treatment regimens can not be patented as an intellectual property. Physicians are entitled to a reasonable fee[10]. Medical fees cannot be fixed by government because the Prophet refused to fix prices[11].
1.4 Medical malpractice / negligence
Description and definitions
Malpractice is failure to fulfill the duties of the trust put on the physician. The term malpractice includes the legal concept of medical negligence. Negligence is breach of duty owed by the physician to the patient resulting in damage or injury. Negligence is defined according to the customary standards of care that are established by the profession.
There are 4 elements in medical negligence: discharge of duty, breach of duty, injury, and burden of proof. Medical negligence may be breach of duty resulting in causation of injury which calls for damages.
Negligence may also arise as battery which is injury due to intentional tort (a civil wrong in which liability is based on unreasonable conduct). The intentional torts are assault, battery, treatment without informed consent, false imprisonment or confinement, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and defamation (slander if verbal and libel if written).
Negligence also arises from abandonment of a patient or breach of confidentiality. Negligence also arises in liability for drugs and devices and as vicarious liability. A physician is also found negligent for negligent referrals, failure to warn about risks, and failure to report a notifiable disease. Negligence also covers professional errors. The errors may be ordinary or extraordinary. They may be harmful or non-harmful.
Types of liability
The following are types of liability: physician liability, professional errors, neglect of duty, vicarious liability, liability for defective products, and special types of causation. Physician liabilities include lack of informed consent, errors, and neglect of duty. Professional errors may be ordinary or extra ordinary. They may be harmful or non-harmful. Informed consent or expressed instruction of the patient does not relieve the physician of liability for errors. The physician is liable for discontinuing treatment without justification. Vicarious liability is when someone is made liable for a negligence they did not personally perform for example the employer. The supplier is liable for defective products.
Basis of liability
Liability is based on breach of contract, the tort of negligence, and breach of confidence. The physician-patient relationship establishes a contractual relationship that can be breached. The tort of negligence is invoked when there is breach of duty that leads to injury of either the patient or a third party. Three ingredients must be proved: (a) the physician owed a duty of care (b) the physician failed in that duty (c) the failure resulted in damage. The physician may also be liable for breach of confidence. The physician-patient relationship is based on confidence.
Malpractice suits: court procedure
The statute of limitations states that there is a fixed period after the breach during which tort action can be brought. The legal process follows several steps: filing a complaint by the plaintiff, serving a summons on the defendant, plea of guilty or not guilty by the defendant, discovery (lawyers for both sides collect more information by interviews, examinations, and collection of documents), opening statements at the trial by both sides, testimony and examination of witnesses, closing arguments, and judgment. The burden of proof of breach of standard of care lies with the plaintiff. Proof of breach is based on a balance of probabilities, on the ‘but-for’ test, and on causation of damage or risk. Physician defense against malpractice suits rests on absence of duty, no breach of duty, lack of causation, and lack of damage. Instead of a trial, alternative dispute resolution procedures may be used: arbitration, mediation using an expert facilitator, fact finding and investigation of the case by an expert. Damages can be awarded for personal injury, death, wrongful birth or wrongful life, emotional distress, economic loss, and breach of confidence.
Avoiding / prevention of malpractice suits
Malpractice suits can be avoided by obtaining and maintaining registration, sticking to defined professional standards of care, peer review, quality assurance, use of protocols, defensive medicine and politeness with patients. The best protection against medical negligence is the conscience of all health care workers to make sure that mistakes do not occur. Well written records can be a defense for the physician.
1.5 Legal tests for negligence: Bolam as modified by Bolitho’
THE BOLAM CASE
In a famous case tried in 1957, important legal principles were pronounced by the judge and they have subsequently become part of the law.
The background to the case was that Bolam, a mentally ill patient, suffered fractures during electroconvulsive treatment. This type of treatment was accepted as a normal treatment for mental disorders at that time. The patient had consented to the procedure.
When he suffered a fracture he sued in court. Two problems arose. He was not given full information when he was making his consent because he was not told about the risk of fracture associated with electroconvulsive therapy which was estimated at 1 in 10,000. He was also not given a muscle relaxant that decreases the risk of fracture during the procedure.
At that time there existed differences in professional opinions. Some physicians considered informing the patient about the risk of fracture and using a muscle relaxant as necessary whereas others did not think so. There was therefore no single standard of care against which the actions of the attending physician could be judge to find him negligent or not negligent.
The judge ruled that doctors could not be found negligent if they acted according to a professional opinion accepted by a reasonable body of medical opinion even if there could exist a contrary opinion by another responsible body of medical opinion.
THE BOLITHO CASE
In a subsequent case of Bolitho, a patient who suffered brain damage because the doctor failed to intubate, the court ruled that doctors are expected to follow responsible medical opinion but would not be found negligent in cases in which that opinion did not stand up to logical analysis. The court thus set a principle that the court could over-rule medical opinion that was not logical in a specific case. The implication of this was that medical opinion was not the final arbiter of the standard of care to be used in defining negligence.
2.0 ISSUES OF PRIVACY, CONFIDENTIALITY, and CONSENT
2.1 Privacy and confidentiality’
Privacy and confidentiality are often confused. Privacy is the right to make decisions about personal or private matters and blocking access to private information. The patient voluntarily allows the physician access to private information in the trust that it will not be disclosed to others. This confidentiality must be maintained within the confines of the Law even after death of the patient. Confidentiality falls under the teaching of the prophet about keeping secrets.
In routine hospital practice, many persons have access to confidential information but all are enjoined to keep such information confidential. Confidentiality includes medical records of any form.
The patient should not make unnecessary revelation of negative things about himself or herself.
The physician can not disclose confidential information to a third party without the consent of the patient.
Information can be released without the consent of the patient for purposes of medical care, for criminal investigations, and in the public interest.
Release is not justified without patient consent for the following purposes: education, research, medical audit, employment or insurance.
2.2 Consent and refusal of treatment for competent adults’
No medical procedures can be carried out without informed consent of the patient except in cases of legal incompetence. The patient has the purest intentions in decisions in the best interests of his or her life. Others may have bias in their decision-making.
The patient is free to make decisions regarding the choice of physicians and treatments. Consent can be by proxy in the form of the patient delegating decision making or by means of a living will.
The patient must be free and capable of giving informed consent. Informed consent requires disclosure by the physician, understanding by the patient, voluntariness of the decision, legal competence of the patient, explanation of all alternatives, recommendation of the physician on the best course of action, decision by the patient, and authorization by the patient to carry out the procedures. Consent is limited to what was explained to the patient except in an emergency.
Refusal to consent must be an informed refusal (patient understands what he is doing). Refusal to consent by a competent adult even if irrational is conclusive and treatment can only be given by permission of the court. Doubts about consent are resolved in favor of preserving life.
Spouses and family members do not have an automatic right to consent for a competent patient. A spouse cannot overrule the patient’s choice.
Advance directives, proxy informed consent by the family are made for the unconscious terminal patient on withholding or withdrawal of treatment.
Physician assisted suicide, active euthanasia, and voluntary euthanasia are illegal even if the patient consented.
A do not resuscitate order (DNR) by a physician could create legal complications.
The living will has the following advantages: (a) reassuring the patient that terminal care will be carried out as he or she desires (b) providing guidance and legal protection and thus relieving the physicians of the burden of decision making and legal liabilities (c) relieving the family of the mental stress involved in making decisions about terminal care. The disadvantage of a living will is that it may not anticipate all developments of the future thus limiting the options available to the physicians and the family.
The device of the power of attorney can be used instead of the living will or advance directive.
Decision by a proxy can work in two ways: (a) decide what the patient would have decided if able (b) decide in the best interests of the patient.
Informed consent is still required for physicians in special practices such as a ship’s doctor, prison doctor, and doctors in armed forces. Police surgeons may have to carry out examinations on suspects without informed consent.
2.3 Consent and refusal of treatment for incompetent adults and children’
Consent for children
Competent children can consent to treatment but cannot refuse treatment. The consent of one parent is sufficient if the other one disagrees. Parental choice takes precedence over the child’s choice. The courts can overrule parents. Life-saving treatment of minors is given even if parents refuse. Parental choice is final in therapeutic or non-therapeutic research on children.
Mental patients
Mental patients cannot consent to treatment, research, or sterilization because of their intellectual incompetence. They are admitted, detained, and treated voluntarily or involuntarily for their own benefit, in emergencies, for purposes of assessment, if they are a danger to themselves, or on a court order. Suicidal patients tend to refuse treatment because they want to die.
The unconscious
For patients in coma, proxy consent by family members can be resorted to. If no family members are available, the physician does what he as a professional thinks is in the best interest of the patient.
There are many disputes about withdrawing nutrition, hydration, and treatment in a persistent vegetative state since the chance of recovery is low. There is no moral difference between withholding and withdrawing futile treatment.
Obstetrics
Labor and delivery are emergencies that require immediate decisions but the woman may not be competent and proxies are used. Forced medical intervention and cesarean section may be ordered in the fetal interest. Birth plans can be treated as an advance directive.
NOTES
[1] Zaid Hadith 539
[2] Tirmidhi Kitaab al Buyu’u Baab 4
[3] Bukhari Kitaab al Buyu’u Baab 16
[4] Ibn Majah Kitaab al Tijaarat Baab 45
[5] Muwatta Kitaab al Buyu’u Hadith 99
[6] Darimi Kitaab al Riqaaq Baab 60
[7] Bukhari Kitaab al Buyu’u Baab 58
[8] Bukhari Kitaab al Buyu’u Baab 19
[9] Abudaud Kitaab al Aqdhiyat Baab 4
[10] Bukhari Kkitaab al ijarah Baab 16
[11] Abudaud Kitaab al Buyu’u Baab 49