search this site.

201229P - CLASSIFICATION OF CLINICAL TRIALS

Print Friendly and PDFPrint Friendly

Presentation at a workshop on Research Methodology in Health Sciences held at the Northern Area Armed Forces Hospital on 29 December 2020 at 7:10pm. By Professor Omar Hasan Kasule MB ChB (MUK), MPH (Harvard), DrPH (Harvard) Chairman, Institutional Review Board - KFMC

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY GRAND OBJECTIVES (Primary & Secondary):

} Therapeutic clinical trials are controlled experiments to compare the effectiveness of different treatments by randomly allocating study participants to treatment and control groups, observing the outcome of interest (death, cure, and tumor size), adverse events, quality of life etc.

} Preventive trials are controlled experiments to study the effect of an intervention on preventing the outcome of interest.

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY GEOGRAPHY:

}  Single center

}  Multi center national

}  Multi center International

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY RANDOMIZATION:

} Random allocation vs non-random allocation.

} Simple randomization vs blocked/stratified/cluster randomization. Simple randomization requires a large sample size. Stratified randomization balances confounding and prognostic factors.

} In cluster randomization = it is the whole group such a hospital that is allocated.

} Fixed probability random allocation vs variable probability allocation (adaptive).

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY TREATMENT OBJECTIVE:

} Comparative effective ness research. = compare two treatments both considered standards of care. This study is 2 sided.

} Superiority vs non-inferiority trials = see of new treatment is equal to or not worse than the approved treatment. This study is one sided.

} Equivalence trial.

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY TYPE OF CONTROL (We learn by comparing):

} Parallel study = we follow the cases and controls simultaneously from time zero.

} Cross over a patient serves as his control with a washout period between the two interventions. Because of the pairing we use a smaller sample size.

} Withdrawal you start all on the intervention and after a time withdraw some.

} Before and after/pre-post.

} Factorial tests 2 interventions in the same study.

} Uncontrolled/quasi-experimental.

} Pragmatic trials follow usual practice and are more generalizable.

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY SIZE:

}  Large multi-center trials with extensive.

}  Simple small trials (can be combined by meta-analysis).

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY BLINDING:

} Non-blinded.

} Single blinding: participant does not know.

} Double blinding: participant and investigator do not know. Blind can be broken if drug and placebo look different?

} Triple blinding: participant, investigator, and data monitoring committee/statistician do not know.

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY TYPE OF COMPARISON/CONTROL GROUP:

}  Historical,

}  Concurrent,

}  Self,

}  Untreated,

}  Placebo,

}  Negative,

}  Positive controls.

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY PHASE:

} Clinical trials are preceded by screening in vivo in animals and in vitro in human tissues.

} Phase 1 trials study maximum tolerated doses, drug administration schedules, drug toxicity, and evidence of anti-tumor activity.

} Phase 2 studies assess therapeutic activity of a drug in advanced disease on a small number of patients.

 

CLASSIFICATION OF TRIALS BY PHASE con’t.:

} Phase 3 trials are used to compare a drug to a placebo or a new drug to an existing drug. Comparability is assured by randomization and equal handling of the 2 groups. The sample size is larger than in phase 2.

} Phase 4 studies involve post-marketing surveillance by collecting data on short term and long term effects.

 

ETHICAL ISSUES IN CLINICAL TRIALS:

} Justification: Search for better treatment justifies clinical trials.

} Withholding a potentially beneficial treatment from the controls,

} Unknown risks of new agents,

} Lack of informed consent or consent under stress,

} Trials if an effective treatment exists.

 

ETHICAL ISSUES IN CLINICAL TRIALS con’t.:

} Trial when one treatment is known to be better,

} Testing with no evidence of usefulness,

} Unscientific research,

} Violation of the normal doctor-patient relation,

} Randomization when there is prior knowledge that one treatment is the better one,

} Failure to stop the study when harmful/beneficial effects appear.

 

HOW TO CONDUCT A CLINICAL TRIAL:

} Find a sponsor because it is very expensive.

} Find (a) hospital (s) to carry out the study.

} Write an extensive protocol (detail enough for others to carry it out).

§ Study sample selection, randomization, inclusion and exclusion,

§ Intervention, outcome, adverse events reporting, safety monitoring,

§ Statistical analysis, stopping rules etc.

 

HOW TO CONDUCT A CLINICAL TRIAL, con’t.:

}  Consent: disclosure and signatures.

}  Case report form (CFR) for data collection.

}  Apply to IRB.

}  Apply to SFDA.

}  Register in the clinical trials register.