240916P - ETHICAL ISSUES IN GERIATRIC CARE

Presented at a Conference on Palliative Care for Geriatrics organized at KFMC on September 16, 2024, by Prof Omar Hasan Kasule MB ChB (MUK), MPH (Harvard), DrPH (Harvard).

 

INTER-RELATED CARE MODALITIES THAT ARE INTEGRATED IN OLD AGE

  • Geriatric care focuses on the unique needs of the elderly with focus on health. They need not have specific pathology but have general functional deterioration
  • Disability care provides help with difficult tasks needed for daily living,
  • Palliative care provides relief from pain and other symptoms; the definition does not assume non-curability
  • End of life care (terminal care) is care in the time leading to death. This includes decisions about DNR and Euthanasia.

 

ETHICAL ISSUES IN GERIATRIC CARE-1: autonomy and decision making

  • Impaired ability to make informed decisions; low capacity and low competence. Progressive dementia is a challenge to autonomy.
  • Advance statements assure prospective autonomy. They have to be properly documented and witnessed. The advance directive affects a patient’s choices of treatment.
  • Relative proxy decision makers are relatives who decide for the patient: what they know the patient wants or what they think is in the best interests of the patient
  • Non-relative proxy decision makers in the absence of relatives

 

ETHICAL ISSUES IN GERIATRIC CARE-2: Definition of the age of geriatrics

  • Is there a distinction between ‘disease’ and ‘physiological changes of aging’? Can we limit intervention to pathological changes and treat palliative changes due to old age?
  • At what age does geriatrics start? What about early vs delayed aging?
  • . آعمار أمتي ما بين الستين إلى السبعين، وأقلهم من يجوز ذلك
  • الترمذي وابن ماجه عن أبي هريرة
  • The origin of the age 65 as the age at which social security pensions would start with no clear scientific basis; some think it was the life expectancy
  • The long spectrum of geriatric – palliative care. Where is the transition?

 

ETHICAL ISSUES IN GERIATRIC CARE-3: Decisions about care

  • The benefit/harm equilibrium is different in the elderly and geriatricians must be cautious. Not treating may be an option
  • pharmacokinetics, multi-morbidity, polypharmacy, and frailty determine drug reactions in the elderly
  • Elderly patients' hospital admissions caused by ADRs due to usual doses of medications commonly prescribed for elderly patients[i].
  • Drug overdose in the elderly especially opioids.

 

ETHICAL ISSUES IN DISABILITY CARE OF GERIATRIC PATIENTS:

  • Discrimination of the elderly: consciously or unconsciously
  • Access to special services
  • Sensitivity training for health care workers to understand the physical and psychological needs of persons with disabilities.
  • Extra care to avoid miscommunication because the patients may be over sensitive
  • Neglect of acute conditions in persons with many disabilities

 

ETHICAL ISSUES IN PALLIATIVE CARE OF GERIATRIC PATIENTS-1:

  • Deficient decision-making capacity and competence. Caregivers must respect the patients autonomy as long as he is competent.·
  • Advance statements or living will, Is it stable over time?
  • Proxy decision makers, If the patient is not competent to make decisions, his guardian, wali, will make decisions that the caregivers are bound to respect, a competent patient has a right to choose a proxy decision maker. ? Does the wali take over when the patient is incompetent?
  • Decisions on interventions: nutrition, hydration, pain control, infection treatment double effect of analgesics.

 

ETHICAL ISSUES IN PALLIATIVE CARE OF GERIATRIC PATIENTS-2:

  • Balance between pain control and social life,
  • ·Requests for assisted death should be refused. All forms of euthanasia are forbidden.
  • ·Telling the whole truth to the patient requires judgment and balancing benefits and harm.
  • ·Privacy and confidentiality have to be maintained.
  • Can palliative care turn into euthanasia?

 

DECISIONS FOR THE TERMINALLY ILL-1:

  • Geriatric care and palliative care progress into terminal illness
  • Withhold or withdraw aggressive treatment that has no nett benefit lasting for a reasonable time.
  • DNR: Withhold resuscitation in case of cardio-respiratory arrest for patients who cannot get a net benefit from CPR and who will succumb again and must undergo resuscitation.
  • Withdrawal of life support for brainstem dead patients
  • Withdrawal of life support from patients in irreversible coma: ? futility ? quality of life.

 

DECISIONS FOR THE TERMINALLY ILL-2:

  • Is it ethical to knowingly prolong the death process?
  • The right to die?
  • Decision to donate organs: problematic for geriatric patients since their organs may have deteriorated

 

DNR ORDERS FOR GERIATRIC PATIENTS-1:

  • While still competent geriatric patients can be engaged to discuss anticipated DNR orders. The earlier the better. Many DNR orders end up not being used.
  • DNR essentially protects patients against futile interventions
  • A do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order is a decision made by three physicians including a disease specialist and the primary doctor of the patient. The family must be informed of the decision but they cannot intervene in the decision.
  • The DNR order is made essentially for situations in which resuscitation is futile and not necessarily for terminal disease per se.
  • The order should specify which procedures are included in the order: intubation and ventilation, chest compressions, ionotropic drugs, gas mask etc.

 

DNR ORDERS FOR GERIATRIC PATIENTS-2:

  • A do not treat (DNT) order relates to treatment of the primary disease condition like cancer when that treatment is considered futile. It does not reject palliative or disability care.
  • The term ‘allow natural death’ is preferable
  • DNR orders are suspended during anesthesia
  • A general hospital policy on DNR may fail; we need to leave room for situation-based decision making
  • Acceptance of DNR may relate to socio economic status and religious attitudes.

 

PLANNING EUTHANASIA IS FORBIDDEN FOR GERIATRIC PATIENTS - 1

  • Competent geriatric patients in good health may ask for euthanasia in anticipation of terminal illness with a lot of pain
  • Euthanasia, literally ‘good death’ is causing the death of a terminal patient to save him/her from further pain and suffering.
  • Active euthanasia is an act of commission in which the physician takes an action that results in the death of the patient.
  • Passive euthanasia is an act of omission in which the physician fails to take action necessary to sustain the life of the terminal patient.
  • Both active and passive euthanasia are illegal and healthcare workers who engage in them can be sued for homicide.

 

PLANNING EUTHANASIA IS FORBIDDEN FOR GERIATRIC PATIENTS - 2

  • Euthanasia at the request of the patient and with his informed consent is still considered illegal.
  • The distinguishing feature of euthanasia is the intention behind the action, sparing the patient further suffering.
  • An action than can be considered euthanasia can be deemed legal of the intention behind it is different.
  • Withholding a treatment because it is futile is acceptable but withholding it to hasten the death of the patient to avoid further suffering is passive euthanasia.